What is not often acknowledged is that far more engineers use AC than architects and a lot of the features of AC are focused accordingly (ie things that you might have thought architects would want aren’t there and things that you wouldn’t think they would need are). The market dominance that gave them persists to this day. The bulk of the very expensive programs were largely reserved for the aerospace industry initially and most of these disappeared as AutoCAD developed more features and became more in line with expected cost.īy the early 1990’s AutoCAD had evolved into the more widely used design package and I suspect its overwhelming popularity generated its position as the de facto industry standard until this day.Īs a building designer who was keen to get into using CAD at a time when it was still fairly costly (late 1980s), I think I started with TurboCad, moved on to RoboCad, and finally migrated to AutoCad when LT suddenly made it a much more affordable option.Īs others have said, AC was one of the first out of the blocks and got the widest circulation. AutoCad was one of the offerings that fell within the higher end of those programs that were considered “middle range” in affordability according to many of the design industry publications of that era.
#CHIEF ARCHITECT VS SKETCHUP PROFESSIONAL#
Most were outlandishly expensive while the less expensive offerings were considered little more than toys by professional users. When CAD initially became prevalent, sometime during the late 1980’s, there were a significant total of alternate CAD softwares from which to choose.
#CHIEF ARCHITECT VS SKETCHUP SOFTWARE#
I think this has to do with the fact that AutoCad predates SketchUp and many other technical software programs. Why is AutoCAD the industry standard? Is it because it has more tools than SketchUp before the addition of extensions, potential unreliability of extensions, or something to do with a preference of NURBS surfaces over polygon meshes? I don’t know.
I’ve read that many other people feel the same way about AutoCAD being overly difficult to use, yet AutoCAD remains the industry standard. I’ve read that some people think AutoCAD is easy if you have great typing skills and learn the shortcuts, but I feel like AutoCAD is unreasonably difficult to use. SketchUp and AutoCAD can make 3D models, plans, and renders (with 3rd party software), yet SketchUp is so much simpler to use. I know that SketchUp is capable of getting professional work done and it’s easier to learn, so why is Autodesk the industry standard? I feel like I’d be disadvantaging myself by making AutoCAD my primary software because it’s so difficult to learn, yet its output capabilities are similar to SketchUp’s. Would I be disadvantaging myself by choosing to use SketchUp while Autodesk software is the industry standard for architecture? Personally, I prefer SketchUp over AutoCAD.
0 kommentar(er)
